The Nats currently exhibit a troubling discrepancy in performance: a respectable 32-22 record against teams under .500, juxtaposed with a dismal 37-65 against teams over .500.
CJ Abrams' demotion appears more punitive than instructive, with speculation that late-night behavior led to the team's decision, rather than solely performance on the field.
Veteran players often receive leniency based on their experience and performance, whereas young players like Abrams face stricter consequences for their actions, which raises questions about fairness.
The Nats could have opted for a less drastic measure than demoting Abrams, perhaps benching him instead, particularly when there are no clear rules governing player behavior.
Collection
[
|
...
]