"History loves to flatten the past: Java was the default enterprise language, and then came a wave of challengers - C#, Python, Ruby, Scala, Kotlin, and even Go. But in the mid-2000s there was one language that, on paper, had the best shot at replacing Java in its own territory: Scala. It had type safety, functional programming, JVM compatibility, and the academic weight of Martin Odersky's design."
"JVM Compatibility: Scala ran on the JVM and could interoperate with existing Java libraries. That was critical for enterprise adoption. Expressiveness: Compared to verbose Java 5 and 6, Scala code was dramatically shorter. Functional + OO Hybrid: It promised the best of both worlds - functional programming patterns with object-oriented familiarity. Big Tech Endorsement: Twitter, LinkedIn, and Foursquare famously embraced Scala in their early growth years."
Scala combined JVM compatibility, strong static typing, and functional programming with object-oriented design and academic pedigree under Martin Odersky. Scala enabled interoperation with existing Java libraries while offering far more concise code than Java 5 or 6. The language promised both functional patterns and familiar OO abstractions. Major technology companies such as Twitter, LinkedIn, and Foursquare adopted Scala during periods of rapid growth. Despite these technical advantages and high-profile endorsements, Java retained dominance in enterprise workloads. Scala ultimately occupies a narrower niche within the ecosystem rather than supplanting Java across enterprise development.
Read at Medium
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]