Selecting a Java framework involves understanding the trade-offs between different options like Spring Boot, Quarkus, and Jakarta EE. Spring Boot is flexible but can overwhelm teams with its scope. Quarkus is fast and lightweight but lacks an expansive ecosystem. Jakarta EE offers stability but suffers from slow innovation and legacy issues. Other options like JPMS and OSGi solve specific problems but might be less applicable for most teams. The goal is to find a balance that allows for quick delivery while managing the complexities of each framework.
Jakarta EE is the standard for enterprise services in Java, offering specifications for dependency injection, resource management, web services, messaging, and transactions.
Spring provides flexibility and power but can become overwhelming due to its broad scope, making it a challenge for teams to navigate.
Quarkus is known for its speed and lightweight nature, yet it is still developing its ecosystem and may not offer comprehensive solutions for all use cases.
Considering various Java frameworks involves evaluating specific pain points your team can handle while ensuring timely delivery and managing operational overhead.
Collection
[
|
...
]