"the Federal Circuit finds that Motorola failed to demonstrate a protectable property interest in its challenge to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's (USPTO's) rescission of former Director Vidal's "compelling merits" memo; the EU Parliament's legal affairs committee voted to refer the EU Commission to the EU's highest court over its withdrawal of a proposed regulation on standard-essential patents; Samsung gets hit with a $191.4 million jury verdict over OLED display technologies;"
"the Council for Innovation Promotion asks the U.S. Trade Representative to address specific shortcomings in IP protections among America's trading partners during joint review of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement; the Ninth Circuit affirms a $23.5 million jury verdict for CoComelon after finding that the district court did not err in assessing the copyrightability of a baby character in a series of online children's videos; and the USPTO orders reexamination of a Nintendo patent that protects in-game features utilized by the company's popular Pokemon gaming series."
The Federal Circuit denied Motorola's mandamus petition, ruling that the Acting Director's rescission of the "compelling merits" memo did not require APA notice-and-comment and that Motorola failed to demonstrate a protectable property interest. The EU Parliament's legal affairs committee voted to refer the EU Commission to the EU's highest court over withdrawal of a proposed standard-essential patents regulation. A jury awarded $191.4 million in a dispute involving OLED display technologies. The Council for Innovation Promotion urged the U.S. Trade Representative to address IP protection shortcomings during USMCA review. The Ninth Circuit affirmed a $23.5 million verdict for CoComelon. The USPTO ordered reexamination of a Nintendo patent covering in-game Pokemon features.
Read at IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Intellectual Property Law
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]