"John Durnell sued Monsanto, claiming his non-Hodgkin's lymphoma was due to 20 years of exposure to glyphosate in Roundup. A jury awarded him over $1 million, citing inadequate warnings from Monsanto."
"Monsanto contends that claims against it should be preempted by the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, which mandates EPA registration and approval of pesticide labels."
"Paul Clement, representing Monsanto, stated, 'It's probably the most like studied herbicide in the history of man... that there isn't a risk here,' arguing against allowing a Missouri jury to challenge this conclusion."
The U.S. Supreme Court is reviewing a case concerning warning labels on Roundup weed killer, linked to cancer claims by users. John Durnell, who alleges his non-Hodgkin's lymphoma resulted from glyphosate exposure, won over $1 million in damages after a jury found Monsanto failed to provide adequate warnings. The case raises questions about whether federal or state authorities should regulate chemical labels. Monsanto argues that federal law preempts state claims, emphasizing the need for a uniform standard and asserting that extensive studies show no risk associated with glyphosate.
Read at www.npr.org
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]