Musk and the US government fought an AI anti-discrimination law. The arguments don't hold up | Genevieve Smith

"The justice department's lawsuit is part of a coordinated federal effort to reframe AI consumer protections as ideological overreach. In July 2025, Donald Trump signed an executive order on preventing woke AI, equating bias mitigation measures to a leftist woke agenda that suppresses free speech and truth. The federal National Policy Framework launched in March included a push to pre-empt state laws on AI, with Colorado's law targeted."

"The AI bill in reference, Senate Bill 205, was about protecting people from discrimination in high-risk AI systems making consequential decisions: who gets hired, who gets housing, who receives healthcare. The original bill required bias audits, impact assessments and disclosure, requirements that drew pushback from the business community. Colorado heard that and responded. Before xAI ever filed its lawsuit, the state revised those requirements with a reduced transparency framework in mid-March."

"A 2019 study published in Science found that a widely used healthcare algorithm deployed across US hospitals assigned Black patients half the care of equally sick white patients because it used healthcare costs as a proxy for health needs, embedding existing inequities into clinical decisions. Removing healthcare costs eliminated racial bias in the model and helped hospitals deliver more effective care."

"But xAI argued the Colorado bill would force the company to promote the state's ideological views on various matters, racial justice in particular,"

The US Department of Justice joined xAI in suing Colorado to stop the state’s AI anti-discrimination law. The federal effort reframes AI consumer protections as ideological overreach and seeks to pre-empt state laws. A 2025 executive order on preventing “woke AI” equates bias mitigation measures with a leftist agenda that suppresses free speech and truth. Colorado’s law, Senate Bill 205, aimed to protect people from discrimination in high-risk AI systems used for consequential decisions like hiring, housing, and healthcare. The bill required bias audits, impact assessments, and disclosure, which faced business pushback. Colorado revised transparency requirements after that pushback. Evidence from a 2019 Science study showed a healthcare algorithm embedded racial inequities through a proxy variable, and removing the proxy eliminated racial bias. xAI argued the Colorado bill would require promoting ideological views, especially on racial justice.

Read at www.theguardian.com