by Dennis Crouch
In Salazar v. AT&T Mobility LLC, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment of noninfringement.Once again, the Federal Circuit was called upon to interpret the claim term "a," this time to determine if Salazar's claim requiring " a microprocessor" was limited to a single microprocessor.
In Salazar v. AT&T Mobility LLC, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment of noninfringement.Once again, the Federal Circuit was called upon to interpret the claim term "a," this time to determine if Salazar's claim requiring " a microprocessor" was limited to a single microprocessor.
[
add
]
[
|
|
...
]