"Section 230 is not one of the Ten Commandments. This idea that we can't touch it, otherwise internet freedom incinerates, is preposterous. Sens. Dick Durbin and Lindsey Graham have introduced a bill to sunset Section 230 entirely just as the law turned 30 years old, while other proposals seek to narrow its scope."
"Section 230 protects social media platforms, newspaper comment sections, and other online forums from being held liable for content their users post, and protects platforms if they choose to limit or remove that content. It's foundational to many online services, but critics believe its protections are too sprawling and outdated for massively successful Big Tech companies."
"Matthew Bergman, whose Social Media Victims Law Center has led the charge in this product liability model of social media litigation, testified before the committee with parents sitting behind him holding photos of their children who died after allegedly facing online harms. Bergman said he does not support a full repeal of Section 230."
Section 230 protects online platforms from liability for user-generated content and their moderation decisions. At a Senate Commerce Committee hearing, lawmakers expressed bipartisan concern about the law's breadth, with some proposing to sunset or narrow it entirely. The debate focused on two main issues: harm to children and allegations of over-policing conservative content. A concurrent product liability trial in Los Angeles examines whether Instagram and YouTube's design features caused harm to a young plaintiff. Matthew Bergman, leading social media litigation efforts, testified that while he opposes full repeal, Congress should clarify that Section 230 doesn't protect certain platform design choices.
Read at The Verge
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]