ArXiv introduces one-year ban for researchers who submit papers with unchecked AI-generated content

"ArXiv will ban authors for one year if they submit papers containing obvious signs of unchecked AI generation. Thomas Dietterich, chair of arXiv's computer science section, announced the policy on Thursday, writing that submissions with " incontrovertible evidence" of unvetted large language model output mean " we can't trust anything in the paper.""

"The rule is not a blanket prohibition on using AI tools. Researchers can still use language models for drafting, editing, or analysis. What triggers the penalty is evidence that an author pasted LLM output into a paper without checking it, the kind of carelessness that produces hallucinated references, placeholder instructions from the chatbot, or fabricated data tables with notes reading " fill in with the real numbers from your experiments. ""

"If moderators find such evidence and a section chair confirms it, the author faces a one-year ban from arXiv, after which all subsequent submissions must first be accepted by a peer-reviewed journal before they can appear on the platform. ArXiv is not a journal. It does not peer-review papers."

"But it has become the de facto way that research circulates in several of the fastest-moving fields in science, particularly machine learning and artificial intelligence. Papers posted to arXiv are read, cited, and built upon long before they appear in formal publications, if they ever do. That makes the platform's quality standards unusually"

ArXiv will ban authors for one year when submissions show clear evidence of unvetted large language model output. The policy targets cases where LLM text is pasted into papers without checking, leading to hallucinated references, leftover chatbot instructions, or fabricated data tables with notes to fill in real experimental numbers. The rule does not ban using AI tools; researchers may use language models for drafting, editing, or analysis. Moderators must find evidence and a section chair must confirm it before the ban applies. After the ban, future submissions must be accepted by a peer-reviewed journal before appearing on the platform. ArXiv is widely used for early research distribution in fast-moving fields and lacks peer review.

Read at TNW | Artificial-Intelligence