A Point of View vs The Point of View: Federal Circuit's Subtle Claim Construction
Briefly

The appellate court held the PTAB erroneously construed a disputed claim term by failing to appreciate the significance of "a" versus "the" in the claims. It also found the PTAB violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) by resting its obviousness determination on arguments and evidence not squarely raised by the parties.
Portrait mode is incredibly popular on Apple and Android phones and so the industry is eager to invalidate the patent held by Tel Aviv based Corephotonics.
The appellate court held that the PTAB's construction was erroneous because it failed to appreciate the significance of "a" versus "the" in the claims, which led to an overly broad construction that included both perspective and position requirements.
Read at Patently-O
[
add
]
[
|
|
]