Pentesting identifies real-world security weaknesses before adversaries exploit them. Traditional delivery methods—static PDFs, emailed documents, and spreadsheet-based tracking—introduce delays, inefficiencies, and reduce the value of findings. Manual extraction and ticket creation in systems like Jira or ServiceNow slow remediation, often allowing days or weeks to pass before fixes begin. Automated delivery integrates rules-based workflows to push pentest findings in real time, enabling faster handoffs, standardized processes, and reduced manual effort. Automation supports Continuous Threat Exposure Management by handling higher volumes of findings, accelerating remediation, retesting, and validation while freeing security teams to focus on strategic priorities.
Pentesting remains one of the most effective ways to identify real-world security weaknesses before adversaries do. But as the threat landscape has evolved, the way we deliver pentest results hasn't kept pace. Most organizations still rely on traditional reporting methods-static PDFs, emailed documents, and spreadsheet-based tracking. The problem? These outdated workflows introduce delays, create inefficiencies, and undermine the value of the work.
Delivering a pentest report solely as a static document might have made sense a decade ago, but today it's a bottleneck. Findings are buried in long documents that don't align with how teams operate day-to-day. After receiving the report, stakeholders must manually extract findings, create tickets in platforms like Jira or ServiceNow, and coordinate remediation tracking through disconnected workflows. By the time remediation begins, days or weeks may have passed since the issues were discovered.
Collection
[
|
...
]