Between 1974 and 1994, influential critiques by Elizabeth A. R. Brown and Susan Reynolds questioned the construct of feudalism, leading many historians to reflect a skepticism in educational materials. While some modern textbooks omit the term, many Western civilization instructors remain attached to it due to familiarity. The article provides a historiographical overview of the feudalism concept, warning that the shift away from traditional hierarchical views may overlook important political ties in medieval society. There is a growing debate on how to approach teaching these contentious historical concepts effectively.
The critiques of feudalism, first articulated by Brown and Reynolds, suggest a necessary shift away from traditional historical constructs, yet caution against swinging too far from established political hierarchies.
Western civilization textbooks are beginning to reflect growing skepticism toward the term 'feudalism', despite its recurrent use by instructors familiar with the concept and its past educational role.
While the critique of feudalism has gained traction among historians, there exists a risk that abandoning the concept altogether could obscure the hierarchies and power relations central to the medieval political landscape.
The discourse surrounding feudalism has evolved, as educators now grapple with the challenge of providing accurate depictions of history while accommodating different interpretations reflected in textbooks.
Collection
[
|
...
]