Students Largely Oppose Punishment for Objectionable Speech

A study of just over 3,000 college students found that most oppose punishing objectionable speech unless they view it as highly harmful. Students’ preferences depend largely on the group targeted. About two-thirds support extra protection for historically marginalized groups, a view described as particularism, and in those cases they consider punishment justified for perpetrators. One-third support the same protection standard for all groups, described as universalism. Students supported equal protection for Jewish and Muslim targets at levels higher than for white targets. Political and ideological affiliations correlated with these patterns, and the relationships were weaker among respondents with strong views. The findings were framed as relevant beyond higher education.

"Based on a series of online survey experiments conducted with just over 3,000 college students in July 2024, the report shows that about two-thirds of students believe "historically marginalized groups" should be treated with an extra level of protection from harmful speech-a perspective the researchers describe as "particularism." In those cases, students consider some form of punishment justified for the perpetrators. One-third of respondents think the same protection standard should apply to all groups, a view known as "universalism.""

"Students generally supported equal levels of protection for both Jewish and Muslim targets-the demographic groups most affected by the 2024 protests-and at a level higher than for white students in a similar situation. Those trend lines correlated in part with political and ideological affiliations, and were weaker among respondents who held strong views on the issues."

""The patterns we uncover shed light on the underlying factors that fuel disagreements over campus speech, including the competing normative commitments to universal protections versus targeted safeguards for marginalized groups," they wrote. "As campuses serve as microcosms for broader societal debates, understanding these dynamics offers insights into the challenges of fostering inclusive dialogue while navigating the""

Read at Inside Higher Ed | Higher Education News, Events and Jobs