"Many of the best candidates tell stories about wising-up. Among the flood of young graduates looking to law school as a way to learn how to write a blank check for social change, candidates with a sober understanding of what's possible - and admirable - in the life of a lawyer really stand out. And there are a lot of people who would make great law students and lawyers who get passed over because they don't realize there's a"
"When our committee of admissions officers do their blind reviews on a fresh set of applications, you really see the difference the right narrative can make. Admissions officers are natural cynics and stereotypers. They're there to recognize patterns and secure certain outcomes for the institutions that employ them."
Applicants who demonstrate growth, a sober understanding of legal work, and realistic motivation stand out among peers seeking social-change roles. Successful applications treat presentation as strategic: narrative choices shape how qualifications are perceived. Many qualified candidates are overlooked because they fail to craft an effective narrative or to understand the application as a test. Admissions officers review blindly, look for patterns, and may stereotype, yet they respond to compelling narratives that align with institutional goals. Emphasizing maturity, realistic aims, and strategic self-presentation increases the likelihood of favorable evaluation.
Read at Above the Law
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]