The availability of preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has been pivotal in lowering HIV infection rates by up to 99%. In 2021, a federal mandate required health insurers to fully cover PrEP-related services. However, a Supreme Court case could challenge this requirement, as plaintiffs argue it infringes on their religious beliefs. The ongoing fight against HIV affects many, not just the LGBTQ community, and the loss of coverage could severely hinder access for all, especially women. Without insurance, costs make PrEP less accessible, highlighting the need for sustained support in public health efforts against HIV.
The federal government mandated health insurers to fully cover PrEP, including clinical visits and labs, to reduce the spread of HIV and support public health.
Braidwood Management argues that PrEP coverage encourages behaviors contrary to certain religious beliefs, bringing a potentially significant legal challenge that could endanger this mandate.
HIV's impact extends beyond the LGBTQ community, and removing PrEP coverage would have far-reaching consequences for many individuals across the US, including women.
Without insurance, the cost of generic PrEP can be high, making access difficult; financial support through coverage is critical for continuing the fight against HIV.
Collection
[
|
...
]