The article critiques the conventional approach to software development, which parallels the construction industry by relying on a sequential, manpower-heavy model. This process—collecting requirements, budgeting, scoping features, and eventually involving design—has led to ineffective products that fail to engage users. As teams hastily patch issues rather than rethink the entire value proposition, they overlook fundamental flaws in architecture and logic. The author asserts that this outdated methodology cannot meet the dynamic expectations of modern users, revealing a significant disconnect between product intent and user experience.
For decades, software development has mirrored the construction industry - a manpower-heavy model where effort, hierarchy, and sequencing define how value is created.
The traditional process of building software is eerily similar to a construction site. First, you collect "requirements" from stakeholders. Then, a budget is discussed...
Collection
[
|
...
]