Goodbye mismatched foundation! AI scans skin to create custom shade
Briefly

Goodbye mismatched foundation! AI scans skin to create custom shade
Buying foundation often fails to match available shades. DCYPHER Beauty uses artificial intelligence to scan skin and create a bespoke foundation shade. The system aims to match skin colour and also tone, undertone, vibrancy, and depth. The brand reports over 90,000 created shades and 99.4% accuracy. Users choose skin type and desired coverage and finish, then scan their makeup-free face using a smartphone camera in good lighting. The AI analyzes the guided scan using machine learning trained on thousands of skin tone data points. It measures depth, undertone, and tonal nuance, then converts the results into a unique formulation recipe for production.
"DCYPHER Beauty uses artificial intelligence to scan your skin before coming up with a custom shade. According to the company, its creations not only match your skin colour, but also your tone, undertone, vibrancy, and depth. So far, DCYPHER has created over 90,000 shades - with 99.4 per cent accuracy."
"The tech allows us to rethink the whole model. Instead of customers trying to identify themselves in a shade chart, we use AI to understand their exact skin tone and create something bespoke. It removes the compromise completely."
"You'd stand in front of a display with 40 odd shades and still somehow none of them were quite right. We launched DCYPHER because every person should be able to buy complexion products made specifically for them, rather than settling for the nearest option. Foundation is one of the most personal products people buy, so it should be personal by design."
"Next, they're prompted to scan their makeup-free face with their smartphone camera in good lighting. That's when the AI gets to work. Our AI analyses a guided skin scan using machine learning trained on thousands of skin tone data points. It measures depth, undertone and tonal nuance, then converts that information into a unique formulation recipe."
Read at Mail Online
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]