Motorola’s Razr 70 flip foldables, including Ultra, Plus, and base models, face low overall willingness to buy due to high pricing. The Razr 70 Ultra received the most support but is still viewed as too expensive at $1,500 / €1,400 / £1,200. It uses older Snapdragon 8 Elite hardware and offers limited update promises, with Motorola UK and Germany stating up to 3 OS updates and up to 5 years of security patches, while Motorola US makes no commitments. The Razr 70+ builds on prior hardware with camera and battery changes, but retains the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 and remains costly at $1,100 / €1,150 / £1,000, making it less competitive versus mainstream flagships.
"The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (aka Razr Ultra 2026) has the best shot - 15% of the vote went in its favor and that number can grow with favorable reviews. Still, among those who want a flip foldable, most think that the Ultra costs too much ($1,500 / €1,400 / £1,200)."
"The phone uses older hardware (Snapdragon 8 Elite) and has a limited support window - Motorola UK and Germany say "up to 3" OS updates and "up to 5 years" of security patches, while Motorola US makes no promises at all. Even with the most generous interpretation of these timelines, the Ultra will become obsolete faster than similarly priced flagships. Moto already doesn't have the best reputation when it comes to updates and this isn't helping the situation."
"Now, the Motorola Razr 70+ (aka Razr+ 2026) builds on that 2024 hardware, though it doesn't change much. It replaces the 2x/47mm telephoto camera (which was of limited use) with a 50MP ultra-wide and adds 500mAh to the battery for a total of 4,500mAh. It still uses the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, which would have been a great pick for chipset if not for the hefty price tag of $1,100 / €1,150 / £1,000."
Read at GSMArena.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]