I tried the iPhone screen protector that's going viral on social media (and it didn't disappoint)
Briefly

I tried the iPhone screen protector that's going viral on social media (and it didn't disappoint)
"A few weeks ago, I started seeing a lot of ads on Instagram for a particular brand of screen protector that promised quick and easy application and great protection. As someone who goes through a lot of screen protectors (I've broken three on my already), my curiosity was piqued. Also: I wanted a privacy screen protector - until I put one on my Galaxy S25 Ultra However, my attention span being what it is, I forgot."
"Screen protectors have come a long way from the simple plastic sheet you used to stick on your phone. They're now tempered glass sheets with a high level of hardness and scratch resistance, and they come with an applicator -- a big contraption consisting of a frame to help with alignment and getting the fit right, so there's no more having to peel the protector off to realign."
"Magic John 3rd-generation screen protectors claim to be faster and easier to apply than earlier models. I haven't used the previous generation versions, but I can say that these ones are extremely quick and easy to apply. I gave the phone screen a cursory wipe with the included alcohol wipes (not adding the obligatory sprinkle of dust to the screen that the"
A few weeks ago I saw many Instagram ads for a screen protector promising quick, easy application and strong protection. I bought a Magic John screen protector kit for an iPhone to test those claims. Screen protectors are now tempered glass with high hardness, scratch resistance, and often include an applicator frame for alignment to avoid peeling and realigning. The kit includes a dust-removal sheet used immediately before application to reduce dust issues. Magic John 3rd-generation protectors claim faster, easier application; in my use they applied extremely quickly after a cursory alcohol wipe. I value screen protectors for scuff prevention and resale value.
Read at ZDNET
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]