The national dialogue conference aimed at establishing a representative government after decades of dictatorship in Syria, ended with dissatisfaction among participants. Many, including law professor Ibrahim Draji, criticized the lack of transparency and unclear invitations, calling the event inadequate for genuine national dialogue. Initially, attendees held high hopes to influence Syria's political future, following promises from the rebel coalition to create a more inclusive governance structure post-Bashar al-Assad. However, doubts about the commitment of new leadership emerged from the conference discussions.
We have a lot of objections to how this happened... There's no transparency. There is no clear criteria for who gets invited... this is not an actual national dialogue.
The participants ... had high hopes that they were about to be part of a historical event and have a hand in shaping the new political chapter in Syria.
Collection
[
|
...
]