"The Louvre, it turns out-at least certain nooks of the ancient former palace-is something like an anopticon: a place where no one is observed. The world now knows what the four thieves (two burglars and two accomplices) realized as recently as last week: The museum's Apollo Gallery, which housed the stolen items, was monitored by a single outdoor camera angled away from its only exterior point of entry, a balcony."
"In other words, a free-roaming Roomba could have provided the world's most famous museum with more information about the interior of this space. There is no surveillance footage of the break-in. The Paris prosecutor's office has suggested that the operation was likely conducted by members of an organized-crime syndicate, though the evidence for this is thin at present. The assumption seems to be that none but a highly experienced criminal architect could have come up with a plan to access an unmonitored second-floor balcony."
Four individuals entered the Louvre on a Sunday morning and stole two tiaras, two brooches, two necklaces, and 1.5 pairs of earrings from the Apollo Gallery. Officials described the theft as a 'terrible failure' and an 'attack,' and voiced national embarrassment. The Apollo Gallery was monitored only by a single outdoor camera aimed away from the balcony that served as the exterior point of entry, leaving no interior surveillance footage of the break-in. Authorities have suggested possible involvement of organized-crime syndicate members, though evidence is limited. The operation's apparent exploitation of basic security gaps exposed severe vulnerabilities in museum protection.
Read at The Atlantic
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]