"There was a time when the Scream series felt untouchable. Ever since Scream hit cinemas and gleefully tore apart the rules of slasher movies, the franchise has managed to walk a clever tightrope. It was both a horror series and a commentary on horror series. It was a slasher series where the characters were gleefully aware of horror movie conventions, and yet it itself was something of a generic slasher series."
"Scream 7 is strange because it doesn't really swing at all. It's like a lazy Ghostface, idly jogging after a victim and occasionally taking a swipe with all the passion of someone contemplating even more fucking jogging. The movie isn't terrible. It's competently made, occasionally entertaining, and even has a couple of interesting ideas floating around."
"For the first time in the series, it feels completely content to simply exist as another slasher sequel. And when a franchise built on self-awareness stops having anything to say, you start to realise just how ordinary it really is."
Scream 7 marks a departure from the franchise's established identity as both a horror series and meta-commentary on the genre. While previous films, even when flawed, demonstrated creative ambition and willingness to experiment, Scream 7 feels content existing as a generic slasher sequel. The film is competently made and occasionally entertaining with some interesting ideas, but it fundamentally lacks the self-awareness and commentary that defined the series. By relying heavily on nostalgia and abandoning the franchise's core purpose of examining horror conventions, Scream 7 reveals how ordinary the series becomes without its defining characteristic of intelligent, self-referential storytelling.
Read at WGB
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]