Todd Snyder Luxe Sport Sweatshirt Review 2025
Briefly

Todd Snyder Luxe Sport Sweatshirt Review 2025
""Don't you just love New York in the fall?" That's what Tom Hanks and Meg Ryan said to each other in the effervescent rom-com classic You've Got Mail. (Written and directed by former Esquire columnist Nora Ephron, by the way.) But you don't have to live on the cold East Coast to love the cooler months. From now until Spring, it's a time for cozier style, layers upon layers, and a wider breadth of colors."
"When I first got on board with the brand, it was its sweaters that upgraded my everyday ensemble. Impressed by the more formal options, I moved to the athletic wear, specifically the midweight sweatshirt that's part of Todd Snyder's long-running collaboration with Champion. Now, I'm more interested in the fully in-house offering; Todd Snyder's Luxe Sport line is perfect, with a more classic menswear look than you get from modern athleisure."
"Amongst the collection is a sweatshirt threatening to steal my Midweight Pocket's spot in the lineup: the Portuguese Terry Pocket Sweatshirt. The Portuguese Terry is simply fantastic in all its own ways. It's a versatile piece that can (and honestly should) be worn as the main layer in any fall or winter outfit. It's made for the gym, but the sweatshirt works for just about any occasion short of formal. It's versatile, looks good, and keeps you warm. What more could you ask for?"
Cooler months demand cozier style, layering, and a wider color palette. Todd Snyder's offerings moved from sweaters to athletic wear with a midweight collaboration with Champion and now to an in-house Luxe Sport line that presents a more classic menswear look than modern athleisure. The Portuguese Terry Pocket Sweatshirt is a standout piece, made of 100-percent terry cotton at 380 grams per square meter and sewn in Portugal. The sweatshirt functions as a versatile midweight layer that works for gym use and most casual occasions short of formal, providing warmth, style, and everyday utility.
Read at www.esquire.com
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]