"As President Trump said yesterday, NATO was tested, and they failed. This sentiment reflects a growing frustration with NATO's effectiveness and the perceived need for pressure to ensure compliance from allies."
"Eroding that trust, Daalder warns, is going to linger beyond the Trump era, pointing to recent polling showing GOP favorability toward NATO membership cooling, indicating a shift in political support."
"There is not a punishment that we're going to give NATO or an ally that doesn't hurt us too, highlighting the interconnectedness of U.S. actions and their repercussions on national defense."
"From a financial perspective, it makes no sense, Daalder says, emphasizing the potential costs associated with moving troops and bases, which could impact overall defense readiness."
Trump's statements and actions have led to concerns among Europeans regarding the reliability of U.S. support within NATO. Despite a law preventing withdrawal without Congress, doubts about U.S. commitment to Article 5 have emerged. Polling indicates a decline in GOP support for NATO, while Europe is taking steps to lessen its dependence on U.S. military forces. Potential U.S. troop movements could harm defense readiness and incur significant costs, raising questions about the financial rationale behind such decisions.
Read at Axios
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]