During Trump's presidency, Europe reacted to the perceived threat by compromising its own interests in trade. The EU's leaders, fearful of conflict, opted to prioritize American investments over strategic independence. This resulted in significant financial commitments to American defense and energy, reflecting a submissive position rather than one of leverage. Questions arise regarding the EU's self-image and effectiveness in global negotiations, especially in the wake of Brexit. Leaders are urged to understand voters’ desires for defense of interests, rather than yielding to emotional and political pressures.
Europe's leaders internalized the message of weak influence during trade negotiations, leading to decisions that prioritize American investments over strategic European autonomy.
The new trade deal between Trump and Ursula von der Leyen leaves many questions, highlighting the EU's contentment with its diminished power in global negotiations.
Despite having leverage, the EU's lack of perceived strength leads to a failure in standing up to US demands, reminiscent of its response to Brexit.
Voters seek leaders who defend their interests; the EU consistently neglects the emotional undercurrents that drive electorate priorities as seen in different governments.
Collection
[
|
...
]