"Multiple use is becoming multiple abuse, focusing solely on profit-driven extraction while neglecting conservation and the public interest. If the shoe doesn't fit, forcing it onto your foot will only prolong the pain."
"The thought of accepting public-land 'sacrifice zones' is unacceptable. This new framework simply repackages the same extractive paradigm that caused the crisis in the first place."
"It is a seductive but dangerous logic that suggests that industrializing wild ecosystems is somehow compatible with biodiversity and climate goals, as long as we do it intelligently."
The multiple-use framework for public-land management in the Western U.S. has failed, leading to industrialization and biodiversity decline. Proposals like the 'Ground Shift' initiative suggest amending this approach, but the reality is worse than acknowledged. Current practices prioritize profit-driven extraction over conservation. The idea of 'primary purpose' management merely rearranges existing problems without addressing the root causes. Accepting public-land 'sacrifice zones' is unacceptable, as it perpetuates the extractive paradigm that has led to ecological crises. A new approach is necessary to align with biodiversity and climate goals.
#public-land-management #biodiversity #ecological-degradation #multiple-use-framework #ground-shift-initiative
Read at High Country News
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]