Napa Valley College's $7.5 million solar field was once a model. Now it sits dead in the weeds

"A crowd had assembled to toast the school's new solar field 5,600 photovoltaic panels arranged in neat rows across 5 acres of floodplain the school said couldn't be used for much else beyond hay cultivation. Solar installations are ubiquitous now, on desert plains, winery properties and carports. In 2006, they looked like the future. Rep. Mike Thompson addressed the onlookers that day, calling the project a model and inspiration. Then two students flipped a symbolic power switch, marking what was seen as the beginning of a new energy era for the campus."

"At the time, the photovoltaic array was the fifth largest in the United States. The system could generate about 1.2 megawatts of power roughly 40% of the campus' electricity needs with panels that automatically pivoted with the sun. Officials estimated it would shave about $300,000 a year from PG&E bills. NVC proudly featured the solar field on the cover of its 2005-06 Report to the Community."

"Some reports predicted a 25-year lifespan for the system. Others said 30. But roughly 15 years after that ribbon-cutting moment, the panels went dark. They now sit idle and overgrown with weeds. What happened to Napa Valley College's $7.5 million solar field? The answer points to a public institution unable to keep pace with a rapidly evolving industry, and offers a cautionary tale for other energy innovators navigating the turbulent world of solar power."

A 2006 Napa Valley College solar installation comprised 5,600 photovoltaic panels across five acres, initially producing about 1.2 megawatts and covering roughly 40% of campus electricity needs. Officials projected annual savings of about $300,000 and anticipated a 25-to-30-year lifespan. The project received local and international attention and was promoted as a model for emissions reduction. Roughly 15 years after commissioning, the array ceased functioning and became overgrown. The failure traces to the institution's inability to keep pace with rapid industry changes and maintenance demands, offering a cautionary example for other public energy projects.

Read at www.pressdemocrat.com