Bikelash frequently arises when implementing livable-street interventions because a motivated minority defends the status quo. Advocates should accept its inevitability, avoid engaging bad-faith opponents, and prioritize emotional storytelling over technical statistics. Building broad, diverse coalitions around shared values like safety, health, greening, equity, sustainability, and prosperity can broaden support, especially among those excluded by car dependence. Engagement must shift from passive public hearings to active, community-centered outreach that meets people on their terms. Strategic messaging should focus on inclusivity and positive visions to persuade decision-makers and unleash wider public backing for street-change projects.
Accept that bikelash is inevitable No matter how extensive the engagement, if we're doing something consequential, an intensive minority will undoubtedly mobilise themselves against change - vested interests for whom the status quo works. Even in the Netherlands' "cycling paradise", there are many recent examples of fierce opposition to proposed bicycle streets, highways, and low-traffic zones. We must accept that reality and find ways to work within it.
2. Don't engage with bad-faith arguments For the most part, we shouldn't spend precious time and energy engaging with bad faith arguments from people we won't, and don't need to, convince. Rather, we should focus on articulating a positive, inclusive, livable vision of the future to decision makers. 3. Share the stories, not the statistics In a post-truth society, bringing facts to a culture war is like bringing a spoon to a knife fight.
Collection
[
|
...
]