A North Dakota jury ruled that Greenpeace must pay hundreds of millions of dollars to Energy Transfer, the company behind the Dakota Access Pipeline. The lawsuit, initiated in 2019, accused Greenpeace of multiple offenses including defamation and civil conspiracy linked to protests organized near the Standing Rock Reservation in 2016. These protests were part of a larger movement concerned about the pipeline's impact on Native Indian rights and environmental safety, underscoring the conflict between corporate interests and indigenous land rights.
The jury's decision has raised questions about the rights of environmental organizations and the implications of defamation and civil conspiracy charges against groups protesting corporate actions.
Energy Transfer's lawsuit against Greenpeace highlights significant tensions between corporate interests and environmental activism, particularly regarding land rights and indigenous community protections.
Collection
[
|
...
]