Premier League clubs struggle in Champions League but is that a bad thing? | Barney Ronay
Briefly

Premier League clubs struggle in Champions League  but is that a bad thing? | Barney Ronay
"Six Premier League teams played the first legs of their last-16 ties on Tuesday and Wednesday. End result: four defeats and two draws. Three of those defeats were semi-thrashings by three goals. Newcastle played well against strong opponents. Nobody else did. Only Arsenal and Liverpool look more likely than not to get to the quarter-finals."
"The Champions League is contested by 55 Uefa members. The notion of six English teams in the quarter-finals should be deeply offputting to anyone who likes the idea of robust competition or a fun run of games to watch on TV. The sense of collective failure in train springs solely from finance."
"It's still half-time. Take a breath. Manchester City and Chelsea are capable of scoring three goals at home next week. Newcastle can get a draw at the Camp Nou. But their opponents have flaws too, and football is increasingly swing-prone. Either way, the Premier League will still probably end up with two teams in the last eight."
Six Premier League teams competed in Champions League last-16 first legs, resulting in four defeats and two draws, with three matches being decisive losses. Newcastle performed competently against strong opposition, while Arsenal and Liverpool appear positioned to advance. The article questions whether this outcome represents genuine failure or merely reflects the nature of elite club football dynamics. It notes that while the results appear disappointing, the competition remains ongoing with return legs pending. Manchester City, Chelsea, and Newcastle retain realistic chances of progression. The article argues that having two English teams reach the quarter-finals represents a reasonable outcome given that 55 UEFA members compete, and excessive English dominance would undermine competitive balance.
Read at www.theguardian.com
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]