Curran stars as Surrey beat hapless Middlesex
Briefly

Curran stars as Surrey beat hapless Middlesex
Middlesex posted 143-8 in 20 overs, with Luke Hollman making 35* and Eathan Bosch scoring 31. After a 37-0 start, Middlesex lost three wickets in four balls, including Adam Rossington dismissed by Jordan Clark and two wickets by Reece Topley early in the innings. Surrey’s chase began slowly, with Noah Cornwell removing Jason Roy and Tom Helm taking 2-24. Sam Curran remained unbeaten on 71 and shared an 88-run partnership with Laurie Evans, who helped steer Surrey to 144-4 in 18.3 overs. A bizarre dismissal occurred when Ryan Higgins lost his bat while trying to drive Tom Curran, and the bat looped back onto his stumps. Surrey won by six wickets with nine balls remaining.
"Needing 144 for victory after a hapless Middlesex batting display, Surrey were momentarily wobbling at 18-2 before Sam Curran's unbeaten 71 and an 88-run partnership with Laurie Evans steered them home. Yet the match also featured one of the strangest dismissals, when Ryan Higgins lost a grip on his bat trying to drive Tom Curran to the rope only for the bat to loop up back over his head and land on his stumps. Higgins' comedic exit rather summed up a performance from Middlesex which failed to gather momentum - and when it did tripped over its own feet."
"After a decent start at 37-0, Middlesex lost three wickets in four balls, with Jordan Clark getting the ball rolling by dismissing Adam Rossington with the final ball of the fifth over and Reece Topley taking two in three balls at the start of the sixth. Middlesex never really recovered from those blows, with only Luke Hollman (35*) and Eathan Bosch (31) belatedly nudging up the total with some late-order hitting."
"Surrey made a stodgy start to their reply, with Noah Cornwell removing Jason Roy (the opener made two from 13 balls) and Tom Helm taking 2-24. But with Sam Curran and Evans combining for the fifth wicket and striking nine fours and six sixes between them, Surrey were able to ease home."
Read at www.bbc.com
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]