University leaders at Johns Hopkins University emphasized that they will only issue public statements on human rights or global issues when directly relevant to the university's interests.
In a public letter, administrators stated that institutional statements can be counterproductive, reminding that the university is a place where truth-seeking through open contestation is vital.
The decision to adopt a 'posture of restraint' follows major events causing debate, emphasizing a need to avoid interfering with academic freedom amidst critical issues.
Acknowledging past experiences, the leaders argued that while some might seek institutional guidance during crises, doing so may conflict with the university's core mission.
Collection
[
|
...
]