
"So often, parents, coaches, animal trainers, employers, and, well, even school teachers forget to teach. We assume that our human or animal students know what we are asking them to do. Why? Because we have already taught the lesson. But do we know for sure that our pupils learned it, consolidated it, can recall it later, are motivated to carry it out, and understand its necessity? Not always."
"In the horse world, there's a common saying among many trainers: "Ask, Tell, Demand." It means that when we cue a horse to do some particular maneuver—whether simply halting from a walk or a more complex operation like jumping over an eight-foot wall—we ask in increments. That part of the saying makes good sense: We don't want to drive a horse into an action if he doesn't need to be driven."
"Often, one gentle cue is enough. But if the horse misses or ignores that first "Ask," the saying suggests that we go to the next level, "Tell." This would be a more definitive signal, more obvious to the horse. It's like saying, "Oh, maybe you didn't hear me, I'd like you to halt now, please.""
Effective teaching across all contexts—whether with horses, children, students, or employees—requires a graduated approach rather than coercion. Many instructors assume their students already understand what is being asked, without confirming actual learning, retention, motivation, or comprehension. The horse training principle of "Ask, Tell, Demand" provides a useful framework: begin with gentle requests, escalate to clearer signals if needed, but avoid demanding compliance. Gentle cues often succeed without escalation. When escalation is necessary, a more definitive signal—increased pressure, clearer communication, or direct instruction—can work effectively. However, demanding compliance creates resistance in motivated learners and should be avoided. This approach respects the learner's agency while ensuring clear communication.
#teaching-methodology #effective-communication #avoiding-coercion #graduated-instruction #learner-motivation
Read at Psychology Today
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]