Eastwood’s engrossing 40th turn as director proves that human flaws, ambitions, and special interests heavily influence America’s justice system, challenging the perception of fairness.
The film’s central premise requires audiences to suspend disbelief, yet the experience is a tense and squirm-worthy narrative that resonates long after viewing.
Nicholas Hoult, as the morally conflicted Juror #2, brings depth to his character, making him both relatable and likable amidst the ethical dilemmas of the case.
The film critiques the ambiguity of justice by highlighting how personal experiences and external pressures shape jurors’ decisions, ultimately questioning the integrity of the legal process.
Collection
[
|
...
]