From Boll & Branch to Bogg, brands battle a surge of AI-driven return fraud
Briefly

From Boll & Branch to Bogg, brands battle a surge of AI-driven return fraud
"A shopper claimed a set of sheets had arrived torn and submitted photos as proof. But almost immediately, Tannen sensed something was off. The rip didn't resemble the way cotton actually frays, and one image even carried an artificial intelligence watermark. The "damage" appeared to have been generated by AI."
"Fraudulent returns are nothing new. Online merchants have long dealt with shoppers who falsely claim items arrived damaged or went missing in transit, or who attempt to return clearly worn merchandise. Now, easily accessible AI tools like ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude are making it easier than ever for bad actors to dupe brands."
"About 14% of all retail returns are considered fraudulent, totaling over $100 billion in annual losses. E-commerce returns are expected to cost brands $379 billion in 2026, up from last year's 5.7% rise, according to estimates from eMarketer."
Retailers face increasing fraud threats as AI tools make it easier for customers to fabricate damage claims. Boll & Branch CEO Scott Tannen discovered AI-generated images submitted as proof of damaged sheets, with telltale signs including artificial watermarks and unnatural fraying patterns. The company successfully prevented the fraud by requesting FaceTime verification. As AI technology improves, retailers must strengthen return verification procedures to combat rising fraudulent claims, which account for approximately 14% of all retail returns and cost brands over $100 billion annually. E-commerce returns are projected to reach $379 billion in 2026, intensifying pressure on merchants to balance fraud prevention with maintaining customer satisfaction.
Read at Digiday
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]