Most of Sean Diddy' Combs's Accusers Are Unnamed. Can They Stay That Way?
Briefly

Sean Combs's lawyers argue that the anonymity of accusers in civil and criminal cases is an unfair barrier to his right to a proper defense, insisting that without knowing who is making allegations against him, they cannot effectively prepare their case.
The debate around anonymity versus the right to a fair trial has intensified, particularly in the wake of the #MeToo movement, with more plaintiffs seeking pseudo-names to protect themselves from potential backlash and social ostracism.
Historically, accusers in sexual assault cases have struggled with societal stigma, and the current landscape of legal proceedings reflects ongoing tensions between accuser anonymity and defendants' demands for transparency in court.
Read at www.nytimes.com
[
|
]