For Mideast Foes, Diplomacy Takes a Back Seat to Military Force
Briefly

The last, best chance for a peace plan between Israel and the Palestinian authorities came in 2008, when then-Prime Minister Ehud Olmert was prepared to give up territory in the West Bank, allow some refugees to reclaim land and even relinquish control of Jerusalem's Old City to an international committee as part of recognizing Palestine as a sovereign state. However, the potential deal fell apart due to various reasons that still seem difficult for Mr. Olmert to explain.
This was a moment that could have fundamentally changed the dynamic of the Middle East. But with the resignation of Mr. Olmert amidst corruption accusations, the opportunity for a significant peace accord died. Furthermore, the prevailing sentiment in Israel shifted drastically against the idea of a sovereign Palestinian state, especially after fears escalated following the deadly Hamas attacks on October 7.
The historical context reveals a profound mistrust from both sides. Israeli officials today perceive that engaging in peace talks would only empower groups like Hamas to launch further attacks, cementing a stark departure from the diplomatic approaches of the past. Experts express little hope that these entrenched attitudes will change soon, making the possibility of future negotiations seem bleak.
Read at www.nytimes.com
[
]
[
|
]