Election denialism, which has become a politically expedient tool for some, seemed to vanish rapidly once it appeared that Trump was on track to win, illustrating its opportunistic nature.
As the counting unfolded, the voices raising alarms about widespread voter fraud diminished, signaling that the claims were often politically motivated rather than grounded in reality.
Despite claims of rampant fraud, experts noted that the election deniers went silent when their narrative no longer served a practical political purpose, pointing to the manipulation of public discourse.
The surge of posts demanding Kamala Harris not concede was emblematic of the claimants' tendency to exploit individual election day anomalies while disregarding the broader electoral legitimacy.
Collection
[
|
...
]