Personnel from the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) at HUD, including Scott Langmack and Michael Mirski, have significant ties to the real estate sector and access to sensitive data. An email prompted HUD employees to evaluate their contracts, focusing on their significance and diversity components. Both Langmack and Mirski hold roles that create potential conflicts of interest, as they possess application-level access to critical HUD systems managing billions in expenditures. Their backgrounds emphasize data collection, raising concerns regarding the governance and efficiency of housing programs.
On February 10, employees at the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) received an email asking them to list every contract at the bureau.
Langmack has application-level access to some of the most critical and sensitive systems inside HUD, one of which contains records mapping billions of dollars in expenditures.
Mirski asserted that the most important thing he learned [at Wharton] was to 'Develop the infrastructure to collect data.'
This could potentially create a conflict of interest.
Collection
[
|
...
]