Traditional Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) has garnered criticism for being slow, intrusive, and ineffective. Developers often find them disruptive, encountering numerous false positives, which waste valuable time and exacerbate their frustration. Moreover, DAST tools fail to keep pace with modern API-driven applications, posing a significant flaw in identifying vulnerabilities such as business logic errors. With today's attack surface increasingly revolving around APIs rather than traditional web applications, reliance on outdated DAST tools can leave security gaps and increase risk for organizations.
For years, DAST was the go-to approach for identifying vulnerabilities in web applications. But it's time to move beyond outdated tools and methods.
Traditional DAST tools are notorious for missing modern threats while flagging non-issues that don't put applications at risk.
Collection
[
|
...
]