The article discusses the current state of AI discourse in the design community, emphasizing that conversations have devolved into polarizing debates rather than constructive discussions. It argues that this reaction is rooted in a culture that prioritizes engagement over meaningful dialogue. Designers are called to reclaim their creativity and judgment rather than relying solely on algorithms. By doing so, it is possible to foster a healthier, more inclusive conversation about AI that draws on shared experiences and insights instead of divisive rhetoric.
We're losing ourselves to our worst instincts. Not because we're doomed, but because we're treating this moment like a game of hot takes and hustle.
Instead, we've turned the discourse into a pissing contest. Who can get the most engagement? Who can rattle the most nerves?
Collection
[
|
...
]