"In our practice, the pavilion is not a closed typology, but rather an open way of being in the territory. An architecture that does not seek to impose itself, but to enable relationships. Between the inside and the outside, between the collective and the intimate, the pavilion is always a porous structure, available, in dialogue with its surroundings."
"In our practice, the pavilion is not a closed typology, but rather an open way of being in the territory."
"Between the inside and the outside, between the collective and the intimate, the pavilion is always a porous structure, available, in dialogue with its surroundings."
The pavilion is not a closed typology but an open way of being in the territory. It operates as an architecture that does not seek to impose itself but to enable relationships. It mediates between the inside and the outside and between collective and intimate scales. The pavilion functions as a porous, available structure that enters into dialogue with its surroundings. Openness, porosity, and relational responsiveness are prioritized over imposition or enclosure, allowing spatial flexibility and continuous exchange with the landscape and community context.
Read at ArchDaily
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]