The authors illustrate that the method systematically underestimates animal abundance due to spatial occupancy not being properly accounted for, leading to biased management decisions.
A reliable abundance estimate influences crucial management actions like hunting quotas; flawed estimates could result in the mismanagement of wildlife resources.
The flawed method's failure to consider animals' movement patterns creates significant consequences for wildlife conservation, indicating the necessity for continual reevaluation of statistical models.
The significance of accurate population estimates cannot be overstated, particularly in ecology, where misguided assumptions can jeopardize resource preservation and species management.
Collection
[
|
...
]