In a series of notable legal developments, the U.S. Department of Justice has filed a unique lawsuit against every judge in the District of Maryland, asserting the need for greater accountability. Meanwhile, a court upheld the fair use of copyrighted material for training artificial intelligence, stirring debate about intellectual property rights. Additionally, the judiciary warned Congress about cybersecurity risks associated with the outdated PACER system, which demonstrates a failure to modernize despite substantial fees. Finally, concerns have arisen over law firms employing ethically questionable practices, including copying previously rejected legal briefs from competitors.
The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has taken a groundbreaking step by filing a suit against every judge in the District of Maryland, asserting that this unprecedented move challenges judicial accountability and practices.
In a significant ruling, a court has determined that using copyrighted materials for training artificial intelligence systems is permissible under the doctrine of fair use, raising critical questions about intellectual property in the tech age.
Concerns about the PACER system's cybersecurity flaws have escalated, as the judiciary informs Congress that decades of insufficient modernization—despite generated revenue—have left it vulnerable to cyber threats.
The ongoing litigation against law firms has revealed instances of attorneys reproducing briefs from competing firms, including arguments that had previously been rejected, suggesting deeper issues with legal research diligence.
Collection
[
|
...
]