Tennessee's lawmakers recently voted to repeal the requirement for reflective roofs on commercial buildings, originally intended to combat extreme heat. The move, backed by lobbyists for dark roofing materials, was pitched as a choice-enhancing measure but met with sharp criticism. Critics warn it could result in greater energy costs and increased health risks in communities already vulnerable to heat. The debate highlights the tension between industry lobbying and established scientific evidence regarding the benefits of light-colored roofs in managing cooling costs and public health.
Critics of the recent repeal of Tennessee's cool roof law argue that the decision will lead to increased energy costs and exacerbate heat-related health issues.
Lobbyists for dark roofing materials claim that repealing reflective roof requirements will enhance consumer choice, despite significant scientific evidence supporting the benefits of light roofs.
Collection
[
|
...
]