The article discusses key concepts related to the naming of states via transaction order and the necessity of transaction data (callData) for state computation. It emphasizes that for transactions to be valid, all callData must be included, effectively marking a requirement for data availability. The use of a data availability layer, such as IPFS, could enhance this design, although concerns about adversaries exploiting availability must be addressed through verification methods. Ensuring transactions remain accessible and livable is crucial to system security, highlighting the delicate balance between efficiency and data integrity in layered designs.
In the context of naming states through transaction order, the sequences of state transformations emerge as 'natural' names that depend on properly specified transaction data.
Commitment to transactions must encompass all parameters for computing the state, implicating a critical data availability requirement, potentially employing a data availability layer like IPFS.
Feasibility in this framework requires a means to verify data availability through signatures from a quorum of providers to ensure against adversarial conditions.
Simply employing a content-addressable storage (CAS) system is inadequate without guarantees of availability; otherwise, systems may compromise on continuity and responsiveness.
Collection
[
|
...
]