The saying 'government will ban Bitcoin' is one of the most frequently used pieces of FUD.
What if, instead of a direct ban on Bitcoin, the State employed subtle and indirect strategies to manipulate or even co-opt it, ultimately achieving the same goal of rendering it ineffective or worse, a tool for State control?
What if, rather than outright banning Bitcoin, the State could neutralize its disruptive properties by integrating and endorsing it? What if the government could harness Bitcoin's 'Number Go Up' (NGU) technology to enforce its objectives and undermine the very ethos that defines Bitcoin today?
[
add
]
[
|
|
...
]