The op-ed begins by highlighting that while business interests receiving electoral support can be seen as positive, the nature of that business—crypto—raises significant concerns.
It acknowledges that campaign contributions can distort candidates' decision-making, yet it largely fails to address the broader implications of such influences on democracy.
The commentary points out the historical roots of 'common sense' to emphasize its enduring significance, arguing that candidates should maintain integrity when accepting donations.
Despite the criticism launched at crypto, the article suggests that Bloomberg's critique doesn't sufficiently engage with the complexities of lobbying and campaign finance.
Collection
[
|
...
]