We believe that the ratification vote that Elon demanded and coerced is deeply flawed as a matter of law, legally ineffective and does not impact our case. We will respond to any arguments raised in due course, said Greg Varallo, a partner at the law firm Bernstein, Litowitz, Berger & Grossmann.
It's simply not clear legally what the effect [of the vote] will be, said Lipton. Assuming there's no settlement, the litigation will continue before Chancellor McCormick. Tesla will argue that the new vote cures any defects in the original award and therefore Musk's pay is reinstated; the plaintiffs will argue it does not.
Collection
[
|
...
]