"Applicant tracking systems (ATS) are now the gatekeepers. They screen, score and sort resumes before a human ever reviews them, and most never make it through. With cold applications showing a success rate as low as 0.1% to 2%, and requiring roughly 32-200 applications for a single offer, the odds aren't in your favor unless you tailor your approach. Here's how to stop ghosting your own job search and start working with the algorithm instead of against it."
"Keywords Aren't Optional-They're Your Currency Most ATS software isn't sophisticated. It's looking for plain and simple matches. Job descriptions are essentially cheat sheets. Scan them for repeated nouns and verbs such as project management, client onboarding and data analysis. Then mirror those exact terms in your resume and LinkedIn profile. Synonyms won't cut it. Don't keyword stuff. Use natural language in bullets tied to results. For example: "Led client onboarding for 15-plus enterprise accounts using Salesforce and Asana."
Applicant tracking systems now screen, score and sort resumes before humans review them, creating low cold-application success rates and often requiring dozens of applications per offer. Algorithms prioritize perceived potential and keyword matches over stylistic creativity. Job descriptions supply the specific nouns and verbs to mirror; exact terms like 'project management' or 'cross-functional collaboration' perform better than synonyms. Resumes should use clear, one-column layouts, standard section headers, and accepted file formats such as PDF or .docx. Avoid keyword stuffing; use natural language bullets tied to measurable results. Skip headers and footers and other design elements that confuse ATS parsing.
Read at Forbes
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]